ZenScreen MB16QHG vs 322E1C Computer Monitor

Compare the ASUS ZenScreen MB16QHG size, resolution, refresh, and response, with 322E1C monitor by PHILIPS, for better video, gaming, and home computing.

322E1C and ZenScreen MB16QHG Screen Size and Resolution

The Asus ZenScreen MB16QHG has a 16″ inch Flat IPS LED screen running pixel colour change at 5 milliseconds and a 120 Hertz image refresh to display clear Quad HD 2560 x 1600p resolution video, and vibrant images.

In contrast, the Philips 322E1C offers comparably smooth Full HD 1980 x 1080p vibrant visuals across a Curved 32″ screen with a 4 millisecond response rate and fluid 75Hz refresh, for enhanced immersion.

Both the 322E1C and ZenScreen MB16QHG screens are sharp and fast, with Full HD 1980 x 1080p and Quad HD 2560 x 1600p resolution, respectively – ideal for multimedia imagery.

• ZenScreen MB16QHG resolution: IPS LED Quad HD 2560 x 1600p
• 322E1C resolution: VA LCD Full HD 1980 x 1080p

Monitor Input Connectivity

The Asus ZenScreen MB16QHG monitor offers various input connections, namely – HDMI / USB Type-C to receive high-definition data. Similarly, the Philips 322E1C provides HDMI / DisplayPort inputs, for fast communication with PC, laptop, or games console.

• ASUS ZenScreen MB16QHG signal input: HDMI / USB Type-C
• PHILIPS 322E1C signal input: HDMI / DisplayPort

Ratings and Reviews on ASUS ZenScreen MB16QHG and PHILIPS 322E1C Monitors

The 16″ ASUS ZenScreen MB16QHG is rated 4.5/5 from 69 reviews, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Likewise, 32″ PHILIPS 322E1C, receives a high 4.5/5 star rating from 78 reviewers.

Both IPS LED ZenScreen MB16QHG and VA LCD 322E1C monitors score well, with clear pixel density.

• ZenScreen MB16QHG reviews: 69 / 4.5/5 rating
• 322E1C reviews: 78 / 4.5/5 rating

BRAND	MODEL	SIZE	DISPLAY	REFRESH	RESPONSE	COST
ASUS	ZenScreen MB16QHG	16″	IPS LED	120	5	£399.00
PHILIPS	322E1C	32″	VA LCD	75	4	£149.00